首页> 外文OA文献 >What are standardized literacy and numeracy tests testing? Evidence of the domain-general contributions to students’ standardized educational test performance
【2h】

What are standardized literacy and numeracy tests testing? Evidence of the domain-general contributions to students’ standardized educational test performance

机译:什么是标准化的读写能力和计算能力测试?领域通用对学生标准化教育考试成绩的贡献的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: A fundamental aim of standardized educational assessment is to achieve reliable discrimination between students differing in the knowledge, skills and abilities assessed. However, questions of the purity with which these tests index students’ genuine abilities have arisen. Specifically, literacy and numeracy assessments may also engage unintentionally assessed capacities. Aims: The current study investigated the extent to which domain-general processes – working memory (WM) and non-verbal reasoning – contribute to students’ standardized test performance and the pathway(s) through which they exert this influence. Sample: Participants were 91 Grade 2 students recruited from five regional and metropolitan primary schools in Australia. Methods: Participants completed measures of WM and non-verbal reasoning, as well as literacy and numeracy subtests of a national standardized educational assessment. Results: Path analysis of Rasch-derived ability estimates and residuals with domain-general cognitive abilities indicated: (1) a consistent indirect pathway from WM to literacy and numeracy ability, through non-verbal reasoning; (2) direct paths from phonological WM and literacy ability to numeracy ability estimates; and (3) a direct path from WM to spelling test residuals. Conclusions: Results suggest that the constitution of this nationwide standardized assessment confounded non-targeted abilities with those that were the target of assessment. This appears to extend beyond the effect of WM on learning more generally, to the demands of different assessment types and methods. This has implications for students’ abilities to demonstrate genuine competency in assessed areas and the educational supports and provisions they are provided on the basis of these results.
机译:背景:标准化教育评估的基本目标是在所评估的知识,技能和能力不同的学生之间实现可靠的区分。但是,关于这些测试对学生的真实能力进行索引的纯正性问题出现了。具体而言,识字和算术评估也可能会进行无意评估的能力。目的:本研究调查了领域通用过程(工作记忆(WM)和非语言推理)在多大程度上有助于学生的标准化考试成绩以及他们发挥这种影响的途径。样本:参与者是从澳大利亚的五所地区和都会小学招募的91名2年级学生。方法:参与者完成了WM和非语言推理的测度,以及国家标准化教育评估的读写和算术子测验。结果:对Rasch衍生的能力估计和残差以及领域通用认知能力的路径分析表明:(1)通过非语言推理,从WM到识字和计算能力的一致间接途径; (2)从语音WM和识字能力到计算能力估计的直接路径; (3)从WM到拼写测试残差的直接路径。结论:结果表明,这项全国标准化评估的构成将非目标能力与作为评估目标的能力混为一谈。这似乎超出了WM对学习的影响,还扩展到了不同评估类型和方法的要求。这将影响学生表现出在所评估领域的真正能力的能力,以及根据这些结果所提供的教育支持和提供的条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号